Informed by the science of storytelling

Echoes is informed by four traditions of research — how police interview witnesses, how counselors listen, how people look back on a life, and how we make sense of our lives through stories — brought together in one natural conversation.

Four research traditions, and what Echoes adds

Cognitive Interview Framework

University of California, Los Angeles

What it is

Developed in the 1980s for police interviews of witnesses. It asks the witness to picture the scene again — the place, the sounds, how they felt — and uses open questions, so the witness does most of the talking. It draws on an older finding: a reminder works best when it matches how the moment was first experienced.

Sources [1][2][3]

How Echoes uses it

The interviewer works from instructions that name techniques adapted from the cognitive interview, and picks whichever fits the moment. It is told never to say a technique’s name aloud, and to ask one open question at a time.

In the interviewer’s instructions

  • “Take Me Back”: return to the moment, where they were and what they saw
  • “Five Senses”: when a story feels thin, ask about one sense
  • “The Moment Before”: “What were you doing right before it happened?”
  • “Perspective Shift”: ask what someone they’ve mentioned would say about it

Motivational Interviewing

University of New Mexico

What it is

A collaborative way of talking, developed in addiction counseling and now used widely in health care, that helps people explore their own reasons for change without judgment. Its core skills are open questions, affirmations, reflective listening and summaries.

Sources [4]

How Echoes uses it

Echoes borrows the listening, not the goal of change. Each turn, the interviewer is told to reflect back a specific detail the storyteller actually said, not its own reading of what it meant, then to ask one open question.

In the interviewer’s instructions

  • Speak for under 25 seconds at a time: this is their time to talk
  • “The Echo”: repeat a striking phrase back to them, with curiosity
  • “Name the Emotion”: offer a feeling as a question they can confirm or correct
  • If two tries don’t open a story up, move on warmly and never pry

Life Review Therapy

National Institutes of Health

What it is

In 1963, psychiatrist Robert Butler described life review as a natural part of later life: looking back over one’s experiences and making sense of them. Erik Erikson had described the last stage of life as coming to accept the life one has lived. Structured life-review programs grew from this work and have been tested in controlled studies.

Sources [6][7][8]

How Echoes uses it

The Timeline path follows a life in order, and in every path the interviewer can ask “Then vs. Now”: how something felt at the time, and how it looks today. Once the app knows their birth year and a few stories are recorded, it points out a decade that has hardly come up and suggests exploring it.

The four paths

  • Timeline: eight chapters, from “Earliest Memories” to “Wisdom & Legacy”
  • Themes: eight chapters, from “The People Who Shaped Me” to “What I Want You to Know”
  • Highlights: five chapters, from “The Moment That Changed Everything” to “A Letter to the Future”
  • Freeform: no chapters, just the conversation

Narrative Identity Theory

Northwestern University

What it is

Psychology research on the life story a person carries within them: an evolving story of the remembered past and the imagined future that gives a life a sense of unity and purpose.

Sources [9][10]

How Echoes uses it

The interviewer holds each story up to six parts — scene, senses, stakes, turning point, emotion, and meaning, why it matters to them now — and asks about the part that’s still thin. Every few turns, a separate automated check looks for a story left half-told and, if it finds one, suggests the interviewer return to it.

In the interviewer’s instructions

  • A few stories told in full, rather than every question covered
  • When a story starts to flow, stay with it
  • Ask what the story means to them now, and what it taught them

Memory Integrity & Safety

Added by Echoes

What it is

Echoes’ own rules for when an AI is the one asking. In chapter conversations, the interviewer is told never to assume or suggest a fact the storyteller hasn’t stated (“When was that?”, never “Was that in 1987?”), never to ask a leading question, and to treat “I think” or “maybe” as uncertain.

How it works

After each conversation, facts from it — names, places, dates, events — go into a fact ledger, each marked as stated plainly, hedged (“I think…”), or inferred rather than said. When a chapter after the first is recorded, its facts are compared with those from the other chapters for possible conflicts. Anything uncertain, conflicting or inferred is listed on a Review Facts screen, to confirm or remove.

In practice

  • A possible conflict is flagged for a person to review, never changed on its own
  • In chapter conversations, if they’d rather not talk about something, the interviewer is told to honor that at once and move to something completely different
  • After 15 seconds of quiet, the interviewer is told to say “Take your time,” not to ask something new

Four findings

More detail in witness interviews

In a 1985 study of eyewitness memory, the cognitive interview drew more detail from witnesses to crime scenarios than a standard police interview did.

Sources [2]

Life review and mood in later life

A 2003 meta-analysis of twenty controlled studies found that reminiscence and life-review programs reduced depressive symptoms in older adults, most of all in those who had more symptoms to begin with.

Sources [8]

Naming a feeling

In a brain-imaging study, naming the emotion shown in an upsetting picture lowered activity in the amygdala, a part of the brain that responds to emotion, compared with other ways of responding to the picture.

Sources [5]

Life stories and well-being

People whose life stories find something good that came out of hard times, and who tell of steering their own course, tend to have higher well-being. Researchers are still working out which causes which.

Sources [10]

These findings come from the sources listed below. None of them tested Echoes. Each institution is where key work on one of these traditions was done. Echoes isn’t affiliated with any of them, and is informed by this research but does not provide medical, psychological, or therapeutic services.

The research, cited

The work Echoes is informed by. Articles link to their DOI; books are listed without a link.

  1. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Charles C Thomas.
  2. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 401–412. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.401
  3. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373. doi:10.1037/h0020071
  4. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  5. Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421–428. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x
  6. Butler, R. N. (1963). The life review: An interpretation of reminiscence in the aged. Psychiatry, 26(1), 65–76. doi:10.1080/00332747.1963.11023339
  7. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. W. W. Norton.
  8. Bohlmeijer, E., Smit, F., & Cuijpers, P. (2003). Effects of reminiscence and life review on late-life depression: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(12), 1088–1094. doi:10.1002/gps.1018
  9. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100–122. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100
  10. McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238. doi:10.1177/0963721413475622

Every life is a story worth keeping